Modern Factory "Econo-Rocket" Cars

Ed A. Stevens

NAXJA Member
NAXJA Member
How many of you guys are into the modern muscle cars or "econo-rockets"?

What is out there that's worth the money? What is considered fast these days for factory performance cars?

I have not followed the current factory performance car offerings (much), other than scanning cover page hype about the LT1 or WRX and some of the supercharged 4-banger rockets, but never really looked into the stats.

What raised the questions is a stop light run this weekend (the first real hobby car exercise in over a year). I had just left a morning cruise spot when a kid in a Neon decided he wanted to have some fun.

I spotted this Neon closing fast, in my mirrors, and the driver made a dash to line up at the next stop light. Young male driver (~20), in a brand new Neon with a funky hood and S-something badges (supercharged?). When the light changed he was into the throttle, deep. I was already in 2nd, and peddled it till we were even, and pulled a car length with a quick shift to 3rd, and then short shifted 4th (pulling another car length, before peddling hard again just to keep the two to three car lengths intact, and him in the rear view mirror). The driver had that serious look, from the rear view mirror perspective, that I haven't seen in a while.

What was a surprise was the little Neon ran well, it was not falling back :) real fast, before I realized I needed to make the next corner (the shutdown speed was fairly high). The Neon driver kept his foot in the throttle and blew past me (so I know it was not speed limited like my old Neon was). The Neon had the funky hood scoop/buldge and badges, and paper dealer plates.

I was hoping he would stop so I could get a better look at the car and ask what options it had, but he took off. I hope I did not spoil his Saturday.

I would guess the Neon would run mid 14-second ET's, and it certainly had better brakes than my 40-year old runner, because it took a fair bit of foot effort (and distance) to drag my car to a stop in the few hundred yards that were left after I lifted. The Neon lifted 50 yards or so later, and made the stop much easier than I did (I think I need to service the old drum brakes, like it might help ;) counter the difference in 40-years of improved brake technology).

I just though it is cool to find a domestic built econo-rocket these days (if that is what it was, as there is a fairly large import-tuner business in the area we were, Huntington Beach, CA). What do these things run (Et's and cost)?
 
I used to work with a guy that had a neon (2000 i think). He said they really changed them. We didnt get into specs, but he said with some mods, they were speed demons. I personally still dont like neons.
 
Neon SR/T. They are pretty quick,and yes they are either turbo or super charged (knowing Chrysler,they are turbo'd). Factory performance cars that will blow most other 4 and 6 bangers(and some V-8's :eek: ) away with ease. For the money they can't be beat,as I think they run in the mid to high 'teens as far as $$ goes. It's a shame they won't stand up to much abuse though. A small displacement 4 banger under that kind of boost probably won't make it to see 80,000 miles with that type of driver. Sorry,but I'll take V-8 torque over high RPM HP any day:D
 
Considering the Neon is really a Mistubishi-built ride, I'd lean more toward the supercharger than the turbo approach. Besides, I don't remember a whole lot of Turbo talk in the Mopar Neon Performance book that my younger boy got recently (put out by Mopar Itself.)

The engine has some oddities for a guy like me - used to old American iron - but it runs well and I am a bit more impressed with it than I am with all this Honda/Acura crap. It seems to make power at a more useful portion of the RPM band (I really don't like an engine that has to be wound up to 7000 or so to make power - and that is also why I prefer the I6 over nearly anything else,) and it's nice to see someone making a runner out of something that isn't built by Honda. Also, I see a lot more "sleeper" Neons than I do the other Rice Rocketeers, which I also find relieving.

For power/weight ratio, the Neon again seems to be well-conceived. My only real complaint with the thing is that I just don't fit it in - remember Hightower driving the Honda CVCC in Police Academy? How about the scene in Alien when the thing stands up and kind of "unfolds" doing it? That's what I feel like. I'd probably be more impressed with compacts in general if A) they remembered there are some large individuals out there (such as myself,) and B) the "Sport Compact subculture" would take itself a little less seriously. Most of those guys just don't know how to laugh at themselves, and they really need it! Really, where is the "sport compact" version of the old Rat Fink from Big Daddy Roth? As an icon, I just loved it!

5-90
 
Well my 98 Cobra has 305 advertise HP from the 32 valve 4.6. The new Cobras are SC and pushing 390 hp advertised. Watch the Lighten Pickups too, they are fast off the line and can run 147mph, a new record for a production truck, but it wont stand long. Seems a lot of the manufacturers are coming out with some serious street warriers. I remember when my Brand New 87 GT with 220 hp was a big deal. :) ALso have you heard about the new Porsche SUV with 450hp? crazy....
 
yeah, the HP on the Porsche SUV's are nice, but how feasable is that kinda power/speed in an SUV?? Seems like a wreck waiting to happen.
 
Raw power really doesn't mean anything, you have to turn it into power-to-weight ratio (which is part of the reason there isn't a car in production that can catch a motorcycle) and factor in the basic handlind characteristics, as well as the ability of the driver (you can give a McLaren F1 to an idiot, and it'll be driven like a Yugo or rolled over - not the car's fault!)

Part of the popularity, I think, of the SC segment is the relative increase in P/W as opposed to the old all-steel musclecars, which allows an increase in relative power even though most of these engines have a rated output of half (or thereabouts) of the old musclecars.

Speed in a truck usually isn't a good idea - people don't know how to drive SUV's properly and pickups need a certain amount of ballast in the rear to offset the low chassis weight over the rear tyres. So, unless a major redesign is about to happen, no-one is going to come out with an SUV that will compare to a roadster - calling a tail a leg does not make the name fit.

That doesn't mean I'm wholly impressed with the SC craze (there are things done right, but there are also things done wrong!) but that would help to explain its current popularity.

5-90
 
I think ol' Ed was just looking for ideas on what is out there, I wasn't interested in debating the merits of fast SUVs/Pickups, I was just letting folks know they are out there.
One more thing I like about the stang, there is a big aftermarket, you can get just about anything you can imagine, sorta like Jeep. :) That being said, my Cobra is bone stock, can't afford to build it, I need the $$ for the Jeep. :)
Bad thing about stangs? To dang many of them. I never realized how many were out there til I got mine, though the Cobra does standout a little.
Also Subrau has a NWZ..er...WNZ..... well they got a sedan that I've been warned will smoke my Cobra off the line.
 
Yeah - I hear ya! It goes back to what I said - calling a tail a leg does not make the name fit. You can make a fast pickup, but why? You're solving a problem that really doesn't exist.

Vehicles are like any other tool - there are jobs they do well, and jobs they do poorly. You wouldn't use a hammer to drive a screw would you? Why, then, do we need "fast" SUV's? You want fast? Get a roadster. You want a working vehicle? That's what pickups and SUV's are for. I don't buy XJ's because they go fast - I buy XJ's because they go anywhere and carry everything doing it.

I wouldn't buy that Porsche SUV, simply because it seems to be an attempt to build a Porsche roadster that allows them to ca$h in on the SUV market segment. I wouldn't buy a Suburban because it's just too damn big to be useful to me. I do, however, need a pickup truck - anyone have a 4.0/4WD MJ lying about?

People get themselves into trouble with vehicles by using a tool to do the wrong job. I saw a Civic the other day with a 2" receiver hitch on it - what the Hell for? Damn thing can't tow its own weight, much less anything Class III or better. Worst part is, it had to be a custom job, since I've never seen anything better than ClassII for the Hondas, and it seemed to be well-made!

How many people don't understand the point of something and want to use it anyhow? I saw another Civic this morning on my way to class that had an automatic tranmission and a Monster Tach on the board (had to be at least 6" across!) and a shift light! Excuse me? Did I miss something?

One thing I've noticed about us old-tyme motorheads is the simple fact that when we get round to using something, we've got a pretty good graps on what it's for and what it's going to do for us. Hell, I don't need a shift light with an AW4...

5-90
 
Saw a thing on car and driver TV the other day. The new Subaru WRX runs 11.92 in the quarter mile. They had it up against the also rally inspired Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. The Mitsu ran low 12's bone stock. They are both turbocharged, and come from the factory with fairly conservative boost ratios on the turbos. That is damn fast. You have to spend thousands on a V8 in a full size car to run that low of ET (or super low gears and Lexan windows and fiberglass body parts). I bought a little POS 94 Toyota Tercel for the comute I have at a new job I started. The thing has a 1.5 4cyl. in it. I bout crapped myself when I got on it for the first time. The thing smoked the tires through 3rd gear. The new imports are getting pretty impressive if you ask me. This is coming from someone who was raised at the dragstrip on Chevy V8 power. I have always hated the "Ricers" around town (there term not mine), but even I have to concede that they are making some nice fast cars in Japan these days.
 
Is that the new 300+ HP WRX? I have heard about it coming but had never heard for sure whether it had...
 
Yup, that's the one I was talking about.

And dayyum...is it FAST. I had to go "test" drive one. What a riot. My dad has a outback wagon so I am used to or at least familiar with Subaru handling. The WRX is a rocket. I haul ass in the wagon...but this was another story.

you can get them pretty loaded for under 30K.

oh yeah....it's FAST
 
Dan Turner said:
Ed, what kind of car were you driving?

Dan


I was driving my nearly stock 63' Sting Ray, with the skinny white-walls (and a baby seat locked into the passenger side, as I usually take one of my kids to the doughnut shop and to see the cars). It runs well, for factory performance package offered in 63', but a modern Cobra-Stang or Z06 will walk away from it fairly easily. I have not played against a factory econo-rocket before, just the odd Lightning and T-Bird SuperCoupe, so it was interesting to see the little car run so well.

Considering I had just left a parking lot full of classic factory muscle cars (including a showroom stock Boss 429 Hemi and a Boss 302), the contrast between old and new factory speedsters was much more obvious.

The performance goods for the modular Ford V8's are getting very modern, with the owner tunable ECU software kits for these engines (something I wish we had for the three versions of XJ injection). I scan the new toys on the modulardepot.com forums every now and then to read about the advancements (to keep up with what could work on my F150), and the ability to adjust the factory ECU fuel and advance curve maps, and the trans shift timing, from a portable PC has some advantages.
 
The neon you are talking about is the SRT-4 and YES the are fast. I am a pure Mopar nut and test drove one in the Spring. They will def. throw you back in your seat. The are turbocharged not supercharged. I could be wrong don't quote me on this but i don't believe the chrysler corp nor mitsu ever did a supercharger from the factory. I have a 98 Neon R/T with a good bit of go fast goodies i added and it could not hold a candle to the SRT-4. NICK
 
Ed, I've always loved Sting-rays. Sadly a friend wrecked his at the track last weekend :( He's got a 454 in it and street tires and he is always fighting for traction. He got sideways on the 2-3 shift, hit the guardrail, spun it, slid across the track into the otherside's guardrails and finally came to rest in the grass. The body is toast, only the driver's side rear corner survived untouched, but the front clip, doors, and passenger rear corner are gone. He's pulling the rest of the body off this weekend to survey the frame damage. The hardtop survived, but you can see where the rest of the body moved 'cause the brackets cut through the glass of the rear deck. He walked away and the funny thing is that he was more pissed about the puncture in his brand new Be-cool radiator than the rest of the damage to the car. Sorry for the hi-jack, there was no real point to the story.

On another tangent, my Uncle just picked up a '99 C5 and that thing is AMAZING! I used to work at a Porsche/Audi/BMW/Jag dealership as a porter, so I got to drive some fast/fun cars. And that C5 felt like it would keep up in a straight line with a 911. He's got runflats on it though, and those things are weird. They don't squeal at all! He did a burnout and it was silent and no smoke either. They do squeal a little on a hard turn, but that's it.

Ary
 
Ask Grant about his (wife's?) WRX :) it sounds like Big Fun in a little package.

I think it's kinda neat that one can buy cars & trucks that have serious power to weight, combined with great handling/braking... Maybe not the brightest idea turning inexperienced drivers loose in them, but that's a whole different rant ;) Another positive development is the reliability(?) Things seem to have come along way from the old schiool solid-lifter, iron head, carburetted, big-cube pushrod V8...or is it coming full circle with modern tech. Like the "new" RamJet ZL1 or 502 crate motors?

I used to dig bikes... like big bore 2-strokes that have approx .2 Hp per lb. OTOH I went through my Harley spell (then into Jeeps) so that kinda detuned (redirected?) the thrill. I swapped my XLH1100 with a buddy for riding priveleges...his idea. I had enough of his Ninja 600 in approx 1 mile (with some gratuitous 2d & 3d gear wheelies)...he rode my Sporty all afternoon.

Still yet the little boy in me wants a sleeper MJ to mess with the ricers with, but my driving priveleges are hanging on by a thread. (Thanks to my Prelude with an inop speedo) It's probably a good thing that my 4x4 addiction is in control of the vehicle budget.

I keep an open mind on these things...since once ya get beyond "car/truck=transportation" (many folks never do) it's impossible to dictate or prescribe "fun" to another.
 
Back in 85 I picked up a left over 84 Plymouth Colt Turbo .This had a 1.6 4 cyl with a T3 turbo and 8 spd tranny (4 spd with Hi /low range) even had 2 spd reverse.
It was suposta be the fastest ChryCo car that year, it was plenty fast and suprised many of the V8s off the line but couldnt keep up on top end (limiter).I am sure the latest 4 cyl stock would blow the doors off it now.
I sure would love to have my 440 Dodge pick-up and 340 Duster back again .
Wayne
 
96XJCLASSIC said:
The neon you are talking about is the SRT-4 and YES the are fast. I am a pure Mopar nut and test drove one in the Spring. They will def. throw you back in your seat. The are turbocharged not supercharged. I could be wrong don't quote me on this but i don't believe the chrysler corp nor mitsu ever did a supercharger from the factory. I have a 98 Neon R/T with a good bit of go fast goodies i added and it could not hold a candle to the SRT-4. NICK


Thanks for the tip on the name (for the search):

quarter-view.jpg


It was a yellow one like in the picture. I have yet to decide if the hood scoop is attractive (it looked overly large in the mirror). I never got to see the rear deck wing other than to know it was tall (one reason why I thought it might be a tuner kit) so I'll have to see another in person before I pass judgement on the styling.

According to the article that came up on the search for neon SRT-4 they are good for low 14's, with 220+ hp at the wheels and 2880 pounds.
 
Back
Top