I'll bite, I haven't e-argued with Ira in a while.
Why is it that the mightiest military in world history (double the budget of all other nations combined) has been struggling with al queda for over 13 years ( I'd say since the first Iraq hostilities under Bush I, but I digress)? Because for every one "insurgent" we kill, along with "collateral damage", i.e. kids, wives and the elderly, we create three more "extremists" curiously pissed off that we have killed their families?
Could it be that the hate and anger flowing from ISIS has anything to do with our arbitrary murder by drone strategy throughout the region? Might ISIS simply be yet another outgrowth of al queda, angrier, and better armed (since we armed and trained them in our zeal for regime change in Syria)?
I'll be one hundred percent on board with killing as many of them as you like in actual defense of the US. As long as we remain on the offensive in their region, and continue to piss away our wealth while acting as ISIS' greatest recruiter, I'll pass on my support.