• Welcome to the new NAXJA Forum! If your password does not work, please use "Forgot your password?" link on the log-in page. Please feel free to reach out to [email protected] if we can provide any assistance.

Earth Day (Editorial) Whose Earth is it anyways?

Ed A. Stevens

NAXJA Member
NAXJA Member
Whose Earth is it anyways?
By ANDREW SILVA, Staff Writer

As the nation celebrates the 33rd annual Earth Day today, it's fair to ask "Whose Earth is it?''

San Bernardino County has its share of environmental problems, ranging from the dirtiest air in the nation to daunting water pollution problems that will take decades and hundreds of millions of dollars to clean up.

But the most contentious issues, the ones that can pack a government meeting with people passionately fighting for their cause, are over how the land should be used or protected.

That can range from setting aside prime land along Interstate 10 for the endangered Delhi Sands flower-loving fly to closing vast stretches of desert and forest to off-roaders and miners to protect the threatened desert tortoise and even nondescript plants almost no one but a botanist could recognize.

Usually, both sides will proclaim their love for the land and the outdoors.

"Why do you want to shut down the desert because of a couple of jerks?' lamented Judy Pruitt, 58, of Twentynine Palms.

She's unable to walk long distances and is still bitter about the 1994 California Desert Protection Act, which created the huge Mojave National Preserve in San Bernardino County and upgraded Death Valley and Joshua Tree national monuments to national parks.

The new wilderness designations that went with the law shut her out of areas she and her husband used to reach by four-wheel-drive.

She can no longer join her husband searching for gold or exploring remote areas just to be out among the Joshua trees, cactus and expansive breathtaking vistas.

"I moved out here from Long Beach so we could be here,' she said. "I haven't been out in several years.'

And each side will often ask: How much is enough? On one side, how much land do you need to develop, and on the other side, how much land do you need to protect and close off?

Environmentalists argue the land has been damaged enough by years of human encroachment, and there are still plenty of places in the desert and mountains for recreation.

"Enough is enough,' said Daniel Patterson :rainbow:, of the Center for Biological Diversity, which has filed scores of lawsuits to enforce the Endangered Species Act.

"Southern California is a place rich with environmental treasures and species diversity, and much of it, indeed most of it, has been lost already,' he said. "We need to protect the habitats that are left ... if we are to have any quality of life in the future.'

Lucerne Valley resident and rock hound Marie Brashear has been involved in countless land use issues and considers herself an avid conservationist who believes public lands should largely be open to the public for a variety of uses.

She argues the strident approach by groups like the Center for Biological Diversity are actually hurting conservation efforts.

"We believe when the pendulum goes out too far, it's going to swing back so far the other way, it's not going to be good for people who have practiced conservation all their lives like me,' she said.

http://www.sbsun.com/Stories/0,1413,208~12588~1341629,00.html
 
From: National Center for Public Policy Research To: [email protected]

Subject: Ten Second Response: Another Earth Day is Celebrated

http://gm14.com/r.htmlc=191957&r=19...http://www.nationalcenter.org/&g=0&f=84633183

Ten Second Response

Fast Facts on the Environment

http://gm14.com/r.htmlc=191957&r=19...http://www.nationalcenter.org/&g=0&f=84633183


Another Earth
Day is Celebrated, Yet Environmentalists Continue Supporting Failed
Programs

DATE: April 21, 2003

BACKGROUND: Since 1970, April 22 has been recognized as Earth Day.
The environmental left will mark the date with press releases,
rallies and other activities calling for additional government
regulations and more private and public expenditures to "save the
planet."

"Loggers losing their jobs because of spotted owl legislation is, in
my eyes, no different than people being out of work after the
furnaces of Dachau shut down."

This quote from the late David Brower, founder of Friends of the
Earth and the first Sierra Club executive director, is one of many
statements made over the years by environmentalists who support
radical legislation to protect certain species of plants and animals.

Since 1973, the flawed Endangered Species Act (ESA) has been cited by
environmental groups across the country as the only way to save
species on the brink of extinction.

TEN SECOND RESPONSE: Endangered Species Act regulations have not been
a successful tool for saving species threatened with extinction, but
it does place a large burden on American property owners, the economy
and residents of many states.

THIRTY SECOND RESPONSE: Environmentalists tout the necessity of
protecting plants and animals through vigorous enforcement of the
Endangered Species Act. Preserving species is a noble goal, but the
ESA isn't doing the job. Of the 1,254 species listed as endangered
since the ESA enacted in 1973, only 33 have been taken off the
endangered list. Twelve of the 33 were removed due to erroneous
population counts or data entry errors. That means less than one
percent of listed species were recovered over the last 30 years.
Meanwhile, ESA enforcement costs consumers and taxpayers more than $1
billion a year in litigation, lost profits, lost jobs and rising
business and governmental operational costs.

DISCUSSION: David Brower's comparison of loggers to Nazi death camp
workers may sound extreme, but Brower was one of the environmental
movement's leading figures until his death in 2000. The environmental
left has a rich legacy of extreme claims and wild predictions of
environmental devastation. These environmentalists typically agree
that reforms to the ESA that seem commonsense are unacceptable.
Examples include proposals to base ESA regulations on more rigorous,
peer-reviewed scientific analysis and proposals to compensate
landowners who lose the use of their land because of ESA regulations.

We do our environment a disservice if we observe Earth Day with the
belief that all claims peddled by the environmental left are true.
Similarly, we need not support every program and law backed by
environmental advocacy groups. These programs aren't always the best
way to meet environmental challenges, and sometimes even cause more
harm than good.

FOR MORE INFORMATION: Please see our recommended links at right or
visit

http://gm14.com/r.html?c=191957&r=1...ww.nationalcenter.org/TSR.html&g=0&f=84633183

our website.

by Christopher Burger, Program Coordinator, John P. McGovern, MD
Center for Environmental and Regulatory Affairs, The National Center
for Public Policy Research

Contact the author at: 202-371-1400 or
[email protected]






Contents
<>

Another Earth Day is Celebrated, Yet Environmentalists Continue
Supporting Failed Programs
<>• Recommended Links
<>• More Valuable Links





Recommended Links

Biodiversity and Endangered Species section of the Earth Day 2003
Information Center's "Myths and Facts About the Environment" at
<http://gm14.com/r.html?c=191957&r=1...ter.org/EarthDay03Myths.html#F&g=0&f=84633183>http://www.nationalcenter.org/EarthDay03Myths.html#F

Smart Growth and Land Use section of the Earth Day 2003 Information
Center's "Myths and Facts About the Environment" at
<http://gm14.com/r.html?c=191957&r=1...ter.org/EarthDay03Myths.html#C&g=0&f=84633183>http://www.nationalcenter.org/EarthDay03Myths.html#C

Energy section of the Earth Day 2003 Information Center's "Myths and
Facts About the Environment" at
<http://gm14.com/r.html?c=191957&r=1...ter.org/EarthDay03Myths.html#B&g=0&f=84633183>http://www.nationalcenter.org/EarthDay03Myths.html#B

Global Warming section of the Earth Day 2003 Information Center's
"Myths and Facts About the Environment" at
<http://gm14.com/r.html?c=191957&r=1...ter.org/EarthDay03Myths.html#A&g=0&f=84633183>http://www.nationalcenter.org/EarthDay03Myths.html#A

Air and Water Quality section of the Earth Day 2003 Information
Center's "Myths and Facts About the Environment" at
<http://gm14.com/r.html?c=191957&r=1...ter.org/EarthDay03Myths.html#D&g=0&f=84633183>http://www.nationalcenter.org/EarthDay03Myths.html#D

Chemicals section of the Earth Day 2003 Information Center's "Myths
and Facts About the Environment" at
<http://gm14.com/r.html?c=191957&r=1...ter.org/EarthDay03Myths.html#E&g=0&f=84633183>http://www.nationalcenter.org/EarthDay03Myths.html#E




National Center for Public Policy Research
777 N. Capitol St. NE #803
Washington, DC 20002
(202) 371-1400
Fax (202) 408-7773
[email protected]
 
Back
Top