MogifiedXJ said:
Why in the hell would you change it back??? That's the dumbest thing I've heard in awhile, please feel free to elaborate on why you would want to commit such an etrocity. There's a reason Jeep quit using the closed system. That stupid pressure bottle develops leaks constantly. You have to buy one every year or so, in my case, because it had busted...Again. Closed system + pressure leaks = over heating.
ilovemyxj, did you reroute your heater valve or buy one from the later open system cherokee?
To simplify things - all the rest of the rigs I've got are closed systems. Also, there's nothing intrinsically wrong with the closed system - if there were, why would the OEMs be going over to it in production, including MOPAR, Volvo, Chevrolet, and others?
The "reason" Jeep quit using the "closed" system is the same as the "reason" Jeep went OBD-I - because ChryCo bought them, and converted production in 1991. Please do review your facts - and, by the way, it's "atrocity," not "etrocity."
As far as the heater control valve, I've eliminated two of them with no ill effect - just run the hoses directly together, and you'll be fine. I've even gone so far as to replace one full set of heater hoses with copper line (using vibration stubs to couple to fixed fittings) and that was a couple years ago... I need to refine the design a little more, but I like the basic idea, and it's worth improving...
And, in case you're wondering - any pressure system is, by definition (and in normal operation) a "closed" system - elsewise, it won't hold pressure. Any pressure leak is a problem, because it takes the "closed" pressure system and makes it an "open" one. The "football" tank on the "closed" system is simple enough to replace, and I've given a source for inexpensive replacements (with cap!) and it should be changed every four or five years - for the same reason you change the pressure cap and hoses on every other system. I have noted a MINIMUM longevity of five years with the OEM pressure bottle, and I change them every four (initialling and dating the replacement, so I know when I did it) and I've found them cheap enough that I can keep a couple spares on the shelf for "just in case." The only real difference between the "open" system and the "closed" system, speaking in terms of containment, beacause the "open" system offers external containment of pressure overages, while the "closed" system is meant to have some space for pressure to develop and for the fluid to expand, while remaining contained.
Like I said, there is nothing intrinsically wrong with the closed system vice the open - properly maintained, both are quite workable. The main reason I'd like to convert back is to bring my "oddball" in line with the rest of my yard...
5-90