Better MPG?

jude_23_stark

NAXJA Forum User
Location
Missouri
I have a 97 Jeep XJ with a 3'' lift and 235 75/15 tires. I drive it mostly on the highway. Is there anything I can do to impove my MPG? And what will give me the most bang for my buck? I have thought about an electric fan and different kinds of chips. What chip is better?
 
My experience says to slow down when driving, and accelerate smoothly when taking off. Cold air intake seemed to help mine, and so did replacing the sensors...
 
Beej said:
My experience says to slow down when driving, and accelerate smoothly when taking off.

100% correct. The best way to gain mpg is to lighten you right foot.

Also nearly all the bolt on mods Dr. Dyno talks about on his site will increase mpg. However the most effective I believe is to jettison the stock belt driven fan for an electric fan (1.5 mpg). This mod is followed closely by the throttle body spacer (0.8 mpg) and the removal of the intake tube silencer. (0.75)

Thats about a 3 mpg increase. These mods will add 60 miles to the range of your tank. (assuming 20 gallon tank, which I think for the most part we all have)

Not bad at all I must say.
 
Last edited:
Just a thought but you could try dropping your front drive line. I have been running without mine and doing about 5 mpg better. This is a 25% increase and I went from 280 miles per tank to about 320.
 
u did not say what MPG you are getting.
 
j99xj said:
100% correct. The best way to gain mpg is to lighten you right foot.

Also nearly all the bolt on mods Dr. Dyno talks about on his site will increase mpg. However the most effective I believe is to jettison the stock belt driven fan for an electric fan (1.5 mpg). This mod is followed closely by the throttle body spacer (0.8 mpg) and the removal of the intake tube silencer. (0.75)

Thats about a 3 mpg increase. These mods will add 60 miles to the range of your tank. (assuming 20 gallon tank, which I think for the most part we all have)

Not bad at all I must say.
BS
 
MoabXJeeper said:
Just a thought but you could try dropping your front drive line. I have been running without mine and doing about 5 mpg better. This is a 25% increase and I went from 280 miles per tank to about 320.
an increase in your range from 280 miles to 320 miles amounts to a 14% increase, not 25%, but none the less, expecting a 14% (or 25%) increase in fuel mileage from a minor reduction in mechanical friction is foolish. A 10% reduction in rolling resistance is generally considered to reduce fuel consumption by about 2%
 
jude_23_stark said:
I have a 97 Jeep XJ with a 3'' lift and 235 75/15 tires. Is there anything I can do to impove my MPG?

As said in another MPG topic a few month back.

1. Dump you 500lbs girlfriend
2. Get an 82 Yugo
3. put the original tires back on

other wise if you like the jeep i would go with the TB, electric fan, and the air tube. when i have time i will start on that one.
 
well my 89 XJ get between 18(city) - 24 MPG(highway)
my 89 Caddy gets 25(city) - 34 MPG(highway), and i still drive my XJ more, (the seats are nicer, way better stereo(new)).
 
j99xj said:
100% correct. The best way to gain mpg is to lighten you right foot.

Also nearly all the bolt on mods Dr. Dyno talks about on his site will increase mpg. However the most effective I believe is to jettison the stock belt driven fan for an electric fan (1.5 mpg). This mod is followed closely by the throttle body spacer (0.8 mpg) and the removal of the intake tube silencer. (0.75)

Thats about a 3 mpg increase. These mods will add 60 miles to the range of your tank. (assuming 20 gallon tank, which I think for the most part we all have)

Not bad at all I must say.

I agree with lightening the foot, but other mods just for the sake of improving mileage can quickly become penny-wise and pound-foolish. My XJ gets 17mpg on the highway. I drive around 8,000 miles per year, so I use about 471 gallons of gas per year. My estimated fuel cost (assuming a price of 3.00 per gallon, for simplicity's sake), is 1410.00.

Let's say you can make those mods and increase your gas mileage by 3 mpg. (I've done a throttle body spacer and removed the intake tube silencer, by the way, and saw no gain in gas mileage). At 20 mpg and 8,000 miles per year, I would use about 400 gallons per year and my estimated fuel cost would be 1200.00. That's only a savings of 210.00.

Now, if I drove more miles, I'd save more money, but not that much more (unless I drove A LOT more miles). At 10,000 miles per year, for example, I'd spend 1765.00 on gas at 17mpg, and 1500.00 at 20mpg; a 265.00 yearly savings. At 12,000 miles per year, I'd spend 2118.00 on gas at 17mpg, and 1800.00 at 20mpg; a savings of 318.00.

I think it's pretty important to sit down and calculate the potential savings on gas from mods you're thinking of and compare that to the cost of actually doing them. Everyone's so crazy over gas prices these days that many go way overboard trying to improve their mileage.
 
seanof30306@yahoo. said:
At 10,000 miles per year, for example, I'd spend 1765.00 on gas at 17mpg, and 1500.00 at 20mpg; a 265.00 yearly savings.

I drive about 10,000 miles a year.

Saving $265.00 a year on gas doesn't sound bad at all to me. That will easily pay for an electric fan, throttle body spacer, and the time to take out the silencer from the airbox.


Let's leave the Jeep spectrum and look at the the best mileage cars for a few moments. I want to explain TRUE FOOLISHNESS when it comes to saving money on cars/gas. This is what the car companies DO NOT want you and I to know.

Here is my comparison: A 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid, and a 2006 Honda Civic, they cost $22,150, and $14,760 respectively, and get 49 mpg, and 30 mpg city respectively.

As stated, I drive 10,000 miles a year. So the annual fuel costs would be $612 for the hybrid, and $1000 for the regular Civic, assuming $3.00 per gallon price. So I'm saving $388 a year with the hybrid......sounds good.

BUT WAIT A MINUTE! The hybird costs $7390 more up front! If I save $388 a year on gas, it would take me 19 YEARS to start saving money from the hybrid. Not to mention the poor little car would have a whopping 190,000 miles on it. (Which I doubt the hybrid was designed for, you would still be pushing it even with the regular Civic with that kind of miles on the car).

Unless the prices for hybrid comes down significantly, they will NOT save you a dime until the year 2025. Everytime I see a hybrid on the road I think to myself "What the hell were they thinking!?"
 
j99xj said:
I drive about 10,000 miles a year.

Saving $265.00 a year on gas doesn't sound bad at all to me. That will easily pay for an electric fan, throttle body spacer, and the time to take out the silencer from the airbox.

Ok, I agree, IF those mods lead to those savings. As I said, I've done the throttle body spacer and removed the silencer and saw no improvement. Now, I only calculate my mileage in my head, and I round it off to the nearest even number, but I've had my cherokee for 10 years and know how many miles I get out of a tank of gas. I'm comfortable in saying there was no appreciable change; certainly not the 1.55 mpg j99xj says those two mods are worth.

Also, I'm having a hard time believing the belt-driven fan is costing 1.5 mpg. I haven't changed the one out on my Jeep, but I have on my 70 Chevelle with a 400 SBC. Not long after building the engine, I swapped the stock fan out for a fiberglass one. I saw no improvement in mileage or power, but at least it was less noisy. A few years later, I went with an aluminum radiator and put in dual electric fans while I was doing it. Again, very little change; MAYBE a .5 mpg increase, but then the question arises as to whether that was caused by the electric fan, or the cooler operating temperature from the improved cooling system as a whole.

Now, the fan on my Cherokee is half again smaller than the fan on my 400 SBC, I'm having a real hard time believing it's costing us 1.5 mpg. The factory was already installing one electric fan in later-model Cherokees (like mine), I just can't imagine their not going to dual electric fans to gain 1.5 mpg. Gas mileage was always a problem with Cherokees and SUVs in general, I believe they would have made that change in an instant to unlock that 1.5 mpg selling point.

j99xj said:
Let's leave the Jeep spectrum and look at the the best mileage cars for a few moments. I want to explain TRUE FOOLISHNESS when it comes to saving money on cars/gas. This is what the car companies DO NOT want you and I to know.

Here is my comparison: A 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid, and a 2006 Honda Civic, they cost $22,150, and $14,760 respectively, and get 49 mpg, and 30 mpg city respectively.

As stated, I drive 10,000 miles a year. So the annual fuel costs would be $612 for the hybrid, and $1000 for the regular Civic, assuming $3.00 per gallon price. So I'm saving $388 a year with the hybrid......sounds good.

BUT WAIT A MINUTE! The hybird costs $7390 more up front! If I save $388 a year on gas, it would take me 19 YEARS to start saving money from the hybrid. Not to mention the poor little car would have a whopping 190,000 miles on it. (Which I doubt the hybrid was designed for, you would still be pushing it even with the regular Civic with that kind of miles on the car).

Unless the prices for hybrid comes down significantly, they will NOT save you a dime until the year 2025. Everytime I see a hybrid on the road I think to myself "What the hell were they thinking!?"

I totally agree. My best friend moved out into the country a few years ago, and now constantly complains about the cost of the commute in his Expedition. Like the flood of other people over the past year or so, he was ready to dump his Expedition for a smaller, more fuel-efficient car. The problem is, big SUVs are trading at an all-time low, and the stampede of people rushing to buy high mpg cars means there are no deals available.

I sat him down and made him do the math with me. When we did so, we found it would be 13 years before he saw any savings. I managed to talk him into waiting a bit until the manufacturers hit the market with a greater number of fuel-efficient cars and competition would force the prices down, and the current hysteria died down a bit and his trade-in value rebounded.

The problem isn't just with new cars, though. A woman I work with called her "mechanic" and asked how to get better mileage. He suggested a tune up, which cost her 240.00. There was nothing wrong with the way the car was running, and it only has 35,000 miles on it. She was at work the other night saying how thrilled she was to have a 2 mpg improvement. I didn't say anything, but I did a little math in my head. She bought the car in 2001, so she's putting about 7,000 miles per year on the car. Even at 3.00 per gallon, she's only saving 105.00 per year. That means it'll be more than two years before she breaks even, but there are more things to consider.

First, I question whether a car that is designed to go 75,000 miles between tune ups actually needed one at 35,000 miles.

Second, I'm not convinced she's actually seeing a 2 mpg improvement. People see what they want to see. She'd told people at work what she was going to do before she did it, and several of us pointed out that she shouldn't need a tune-up till 75,000 miles, etc. She would've looked pretty stupid if she'd come back in and said no improvement.

Third, who's to say any improvement she actually did see didn't come from having the tires properly inflated or the dirty air filter replaced (she'd only changed the oil "two or three times" since she bought the car, and I don't see her as someone who regularly checks her tire pressure).

I have used my Cherokee exclusively on the road since I bought it; I always knew I would. I waited till the end of the model year to buy to save money, but my selection was limited. I ended up finding one with everything I wanted (except power mirrors), but, it also had the Up-Country package, which I knew I'd never need. I'd negotiated a good enough deal that the cost of the package wasn't relevant, but it has either 3.73 or 3.55 gears, and I would have preferred 3.07.

Now, the rearend has been howling since I bought it, and there's been a "slipping" sound when I turn a corner after driving on the highway for any length of time for the past 25,000 miles or so (I think it's the clutches in the posi unit slipping). Both have been getting steadily worse, and it's time to get the rearend looked at. I've considered changing over to 3.07 gears when I do, but, since I'd have to change the gears in both differentials, the cost would wipe out any potential savings.

By the way, does anyone know how I find out what rear gear ratio I have? I found a VIN decoder, but it doesn't show ratios. Is there a build sheet in Jeeps? Also, does my Cherokee have a 7.5" or an 8.5" differential?
 
Last edited:
Later model XJ's with auto trannies came with 3.55's and manuals came with 3.07's. 4 Cylinder models generally came with 4.10s. Even with stock tires, Cherokees are often considered to be geared too tall from the factory. Not just for offroading, but also for onroad pickmeup.

For ID ing the axle, there are a few ways. The Chrysler 8.25" has an obvious flat lip along on the bottom of the diff housing. The D35 has a round bottom when looked at straight on. The 8.25 axletubes are 3" in diameter while the D35's are 2.67". Hope this helps.
 
seanof30306@yahoo. said:
Also, I'm having a hard time believing the belt-driven fan is costing 1.5 mpg.



Any belt driven accessory costs horsepower and mileage, every last one of them. Water pump, alternator, power steering, fan, and certainly the a/c (when on). They all have mass that must be accelerated along with the rest of the drivetrain when the rpms pick up; not to mention the energy they suck up to do the work they were designed to do. Reducing this mass, and what is called the "moment of interia" in physics will save energy for moving the car instead of the accessory. Thus the mileage increase.


The only accessory that is practical to get rid of on a street driven Jeep is the belt fan. I just leave my a/c off 75% of the time because I know what a drain it is. I actually turn my a/c ON when going down steep hills on the trail and highway because it helps with engine braking quite a bit.
 
Back
Top