35. Belives the Government should limit the amount of money people make.
36. Is in favor of Government control of business and should have the ability to take over a business when THEY see fit.
I guess those are socialists/Marxist views but they should be singled out as they are completely against the Constitution.
Again - no argument. However, they're still
ethical reasons (albeit good ones!) why pretty much
no current politician should hold office (particularly the New Democrats. The last Democrats I might have considered voting for would have been JFK and Harry Truman - although I certainly didn't have the opportunity to do so.
(And the Republicans? "New Democrat Lite," for the most part.)
It's time Washington had a high colonic - the problem is that people are too short-sighted (and have too short of a memory) in general to remember that it needs to be done and
why it needs to be done, and needs doing at fairly regular intervals. Frankly,
no-one should hold office in DC for more than twelve years. Period. (I would prefer ten years - but twelve would be two Senate terms.)
They keep rabbiting on about how "experience is needed to navigate the Halls of Congress," but I still think they've made the process so damned Byzantine as a simple means of job security - call it "job security by job obscurity." If we kept getting fresh blood in, and total turnover at (semi-)regular intervals, a lot of these asinine rules they've come up with would have to be redacted or rescinded. Simple processes = transparency.
