'Nice looking build. Was there a reason he went with the "A" brace instead of an "X" brace at the B-hoop behind the seats? Seems like an X would be stronger.
With about 6" of lift, even with creative lowering of the lower shock mount, your pretty lucky to get a 12" travel shock in there without loosing a good amount of the available spring uptravel, and so as mentioned you have to limit the uptravel with bumps so that the shock doesnt bottom out. Then by doing so the spring will come off the top (unload fully) with still a few inches left of shock droop available.
Now if you run a baby 2" shock then the shock gets I think about 1.5" shorter (on a 12") so that helps. But why sacrifice shock performance for a little travel.
I am at 7" of spring lift, on 35" tires, with a 12" travel 2.625" body shock that is shorter then even the fox equal in a 2.5, and I have a lower mount very close to how this jeep has done (about 3-4" lower then stock. I full bump at about 1" shock travel showing and limit it to 2" remaining (2" but allow 1" strap stretch, so only really 1" left). My deaver engineered and made coil just comes off the upper spring pad at full droop.
I am waiting for my King Bypasses with a welded bottom to get finished (at king) and that will give me about .75" shorter overall comp shock, and allow me to bump a bit higher and not allow the spring to come off the pad at full droop. Or at least that's the theory :gee:
I *barely* pulled 12 out of a 14" coilover with the top of the hoops less than 1/4" from contacting the hood. this is with a solid axle and drop brackets though so YMMV