Pre-97 Wrangler.

pm1

NAXJA Forum User
Location
Sonoma County
I was wondering if pre 97 Wranglers are worth getting since they have full leaf packs. I have a 94 XJ now with 4 inch lift, armor, etc....and was wondering if those Wranglers are just as capable and flexible as the xj. The price of them as well as aftermarket stuff is what is attracting me.
 
The year has alot to do with it, we had an 89 that was a PIA with it's carter BBD and even with a weber conversion. We now have two 97TJ's that are flatout easy to work on, comfortable and I love going topless. They did not have a 96 so it goes from 95 to 97 models. We actually had to rebuild one of them after my son rolled it and other than the parts being some bucks it was not that hard to do. They did a lot of common sense stuff that they seemed to just ignore on the XJ like putting the rad drain on the bottom where you can get at it with out taking the grill out, hood goes up against the windshield to get it out of the way, just a whole bunch of stuff that makes life easier. Oh the biggie, they eliminated the belt loop ripper on the TJ's, used to rip my belt loops on the YJ on a regular basis getting in and out.. and yes, there are alot more goodies that don't cost a fortune. I did warn bumpers on them, $200 ea.
Personally I'm planning on a dual top unlimited once business starts picking up again, way it looks now it will probably be the 06 model year....
 
In general, the leaf spring Wranglers do not have a sterling reputation for off-road prowess. In stock trim they don't flex particularly well. That can be correcetd with aftermarket parts, but you have to remember why the CJ was killed off and the Wrangler developed in the first place.

AMC/Jeep would have kept on building the CJ foreever, just as they did with the SJ Cherokee/Wagoneer, except for "the CJ Kid." This was a moron who took a brand new CJ his parents bought him (don't recall now if he was in high school or college, but vague recollection suggests it might have been a HS graduation present), loaded it up with a bunch of friends, and went out to jump it like you see in the movies.

Naturally, he flipped it, destroyed the vehicle, and at least one person was killed. Again, I don't remember if it was the driver, a passenger, or maybe more than one.

The assault attorneys closed in for the kill, and sued AMC/Jeep on the theory that the vehicle was equipped with a "rollover bar" (which on the CJs was in reality more of a show bar) and therefore the kid was perfectly justifiable in believing that he could go out and flip his vehicle with complete safety. And a jury bought this theory, and awarded obscene amounts of money to the family of the decedent.

So Jeep pulled the plug on the CJ line and rushed the design of a replacement vehicle, with the primary design criterion being MAKE IT SO IT CAN'T ROLL OVER. Off-road capability was secondary (or tertiary) behind absolute stability.
 
Yeah, I have to agree that near stock YJs do not do very well off road. These jeeps are great to build for a short wheel base jeep, because of the EFI. I am not a big fan of short wheel base jeeps ( I owned a 60 model cj), but if I wanted to build a serious short jeep this is what I would buy.
 
Back
Top