so it's photobucket's fault?I noticed that in my build thread over on CF.... Photobucket is a pain to deal with sometimes. Oh well. Lol.
I'm curious... what did you guys pay for this head?
so it's photobucket's fault?I noticed that in my build thread over on CF.... Photobucket is a pain to deal with sometimes. Oh well. Lol.
Yeah but it does flow 300cfm intake and 180cfm exhaust at .500".
We can agree that this head with bigger than stock valves and port work of whatever quality you want to say, is an improvement in flow compared to a stock head. Flowing somewhere between stock and 300cfm intake and 180cfm exhaust, and leave it at that.
And that isn't even slightly sunken, its like Titanic sunken.
There is no agreement here. The work on that head is unprofessional and less than amateur. Sunken valves never help flow, unless they are covering up some other disaster. And that isn't even slightly sunken, its like Titanic sunken.
One thing many seem to be forgetting is the effect of intake manifold runner airflow. Unless that can match or exceed the airflow in the intake ports of the cylinder head, it's a waste of time and money going for big head flow numbers unless you're using either forced induction or a custom intake manifold. The runners of the stock intake manifolds (log type and especially the smaller cross-section horseshoe) don't have the necessary flow capability and would require extensive modification.
Maybe if the runners were fully ported, which is nearly impossible due to their shape, unless maybe extrude honed.
And uncontrolled.Yeah, and extrude honing isn't exactly cheap either.
I haven't heard of acid used to actually port, but to cover up porting work and leave a cast like finish. Cheating.Don't forget about acid porting. It works very quickly with aluminum.
I haven't heard of acid used to actually port, but to cover up porting work and leave a cast like finish. Cheating.
Aint no body got time for that, tell alex to cut it in multiple pieces, port it and weld it back together. Hes a pro at it.