anybody have long arm pics from their own build?

scottsxj said:
does the square tubing present any strength issues as opposed to round, and the same question of strength goes to how you cut and welded the lower control arms. Looks like a nice design, and one badass jeep


This looks like a stout set up. Very cleam! I'm not sure about the way they were cut and butt welded together, since your life depends on their strength. The only way I could see this being acceptable would be to sleeve the tubes. I would have tubed and bent them first.
My two cents
 
98XJROKS said:
I'm not sure about the way they were cut and butt welded together
im guessing to clear the frame rails since he mounted them inboard of the frame. I could have sworn i heard somewhere though that square was weaker than round, any other thoughts
 
scottsxj said:
im guessing to clear the frame rails since he mounted them inboard of the frame. I could have sworn i heard somewhere though that square was weaker than round, any other thoughts
depends on the application. square is stronger in bending for a given size when the force is coming from a predictable direction. for lower links square makes more sense, though lots of people don't like the aesthetics.
 
vintagespeed said:
Yikes. To all those aspiring fabbers out there getting ready to hack your framerails......buy a holesaw.

Wouldn't have helped. The entire reason I had to do that was because I ripped all the factory welded nuts out on a rock. Old crossmember (not the longarm one) caught and pulled all the nuts through. Obviously the spotter's fault.

There's now 3x3 angle iron stitch welded from the old LCA mounts back to the rear bumper on both sides. With two very stout crossmembers in the middle and cage tie-ins all around. I don't think the original unibody is doing very much anymore.
 
ponyracer1 said:
Looks WAY better vetteboy!! That inch is gonna get ya, you should have cut out the floor!!!

:looney:

It's bad enough as it is!

cable1.JPG


rear upper mounts:

upper2.JPG


Most of the passenger floor was already gone due to rust anyway.
 
WOW!! Nice, what tranny/transfer you running that you needed to cut that much?? I've got the auto/231 and mines above the framerails but still doesn't hit the floor.
 
vetteboy said:
:looney:

It's bad enough as it is!

cable1.JPG

I dig it! You coulda saved a little tunnel by cutting down that stock shift housing on the 300....

I have my 300 blown apart on my bench at the moment, I'll be doing the 231/300 as well, but mine will be flipped cause I'm a moron & flipped my front axle housing and trussed it before realizing that I should've left it pass side drop......damnit.
 
vintagespeed said:
I dig it! You coulda saved a little tunnel by cutting down that stock shift housing on the 300....

I know...at the time I did that I was still planning on using the stock shifters, and putting a little boot over that area. Then I boogered all the threads up, didn't like the positioning, and couldn't fit them anyway. It'll be taken care of before I reskin everything.

shift1.jpeg
 
Mosephus said:
For those of you who made raduis arm setups, hows it drive/ride on the street? Or if you have any complaints?
i love the new ride with the long arms. the arms are more level to the ground which is alot better than my short arms pretty much pointing stright to the ground! but all i have to do to get it to ride slightly better is to get rid of the crapy blown out rusty's shocks.
 
Mosephus said:
For those of you who made raduis arm setups, hows it drive/ride on the street? Or if you have any complaints?


I did a radius arm 3 link with jonny joints and it rides about the same as with short arms and drop down brackets. Pretty much rides like stock except it has way more droop. Still don't run a stabilizer.
 
feerocknok said:
How heavily are ACME threads recommended? I know they are better for certain stresses, but would it be considered a requierment?
There are no advantages to ACME threads,only dis-advantages.Extreme lack of adjustibilty would be the main one.Poor thread fitment would be another.
 
Back
Top