But you checked last week and you implied in your post that the 91 curve is completely different from the 87-90? You never gave the details, just said you looked them up and "they were totally different"?
So I am still wondering what is different, what did you see that was different? Was it the temp-resistance table or the connectors or what?
Yep, we were posting about that guy's 88, and you asked if the 91 MAT could be used with a different connector, so I checked the 93 manual as the 91-93 and 94-96 all use the same MAT, and the OHMs did not match up at all.
Now, quick and dirty here is a range of resistance values from the RENIX manual:
@40 deg. F 7,500 ohms
@70 deg. F 3,400 ohms
@100 deg. F 1,600 ohms.
If you look at the specs on NAPAprolink for the 91-93 and 94-96 MAT, ECH TS5014:
@77 deg. F 10,000 ohms.
If you want I will dig out the 93 specs from the manual, but it is already clear that the resistance values are not the same, and unless Omix has magic fairy dust to use with their MAT I don't think it is going to fit 88 through 96 as their ad suggests.
These are the specs from the 95 manual--same sensor:
@ 32 deg. F 29,330 to 35,990 ohms
@ 50 deg. F 17,900 to 21,810 ohms
@ 77 deg. F 9,120 to 10,880 ohms (matches nicely with NAPA's rated 10,000 @ 77 deg. F)
@ 104 deg. F 4,900 to 5,750 ohms
Now, as I said last week, there is a BIG difference in the sensors and now I will say OMIX's ad is BOGUS. :wave1:
Actually, that is an eBay ad so Omix may not be the villian--I sent the eBay vendor a message that the ad is bogus.