Who's got the control arm length formula?

Since you're too lazy/disabled/intoxicated to formulate a Search.......I'll hook you up. Cut and pasted from a thread back in May 03.

Here you go, compliments of Bones.....yes, the proper LCA length will bring your XJ back to 101.5" WB, and the proper UCA length will dial in the caster. 7.5 degrees is stock, you can live with 4 degrees, but the closer to stock the better. And your front shaft will be happier too.

For future reference, you can rely on that old geometry formula for a triangle. A stock XJ has horizontal control arms (they are parallel to the body within a minor degree of error). When you lift, they go to an angle. To maintain stock wheelbase, use the A squared + B squared = C squared formula.

A = stock LCA length (15.75")
B = lift height
C = Control arm length need to maintain wheelbase
So for a 6" lift:
A = 15.75 squared = 248
B = 6 squared = 36
C = square root of 248 + 36 = 16.85
I just use 16.75 because 17" is a bit too long.
For a 5" lift:
A = 248
B = 25
C = 16.52
 
A hearty smack for the both of you. I wouldn't expect anything less from 2 of NAXJA's most sophistimicated minds.


I'm just not feeling the need for simple trig today.

edit: mr. turner, you're swell
 
Sorry, I'm new

:D
I just posted a CA question, and this thread seems to apply. Does that formula work for the UCA length as well?


Did some more digging here and found a chart, so never mind:D
 
Last edited:
What is the formula for the UCA length relative ti LCA length that will yield 7.5 deg caster? Trekker mentioned a chart?
Thanks,
 
Ed Wulfe+ said:
What is the formula for the UCA length relative ti LCA length that will yield 7.5 deg caster? Trekker mentioned a chart?
Thanks,

Check this thread: CA and caster q's

With the chart giving arm length then the specs I came up with it should get you close.

Bones :skull1:
 
Back
Top