What... and risk more of your long-winded double-standard liberal bias? :laugh:
Looks like a lot of the
creditable people who helped elect Obama aren't agreeing with you, sorry...
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...ministration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
It is sad that anything more than a one-lined quip is some form of long winded liberal-biased double-standard.
I was prepared to stand corrected, but to call that poll creditable?
2/3 of that page is an advertisement for Scott Rasmussen, his books and where you can buy them, how you can advertise on his site, and how to get him to speak at your event. The remainder 1/3 is seemingly factual data gathered from the poll, which is taken through an automated system. There is no statical data I could find rooting through the page, while they do mention a total of 1500 "likely voters" were polled over a three day span, they do not provide demographic data on said people, nor do they provide a list of the questions given to those polled.
In contrast, here is a transparent poll.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/nov/16/uk-drug-use-survey-statistics-poll
They present a statistical analysis of the findings AND the actual data used to come to those conclusions. While the Rasmussen poll spends more time telling you how great they are, and how you should believe them and not the others, than they do presenting the actual findings of the poll.
It is scary to me that so many people, Americans, don't take the time and research what they are told; right or left.
The retarded housing/finance decisions made by clinton and bush did the economy in, not the tax cuts.
Agreed, and thankfully they did... I like my home, and the price I paid for it
